Elections and Coups in Africa

An AfricaFocus article titled: Africa: Democracy Still Deferred, reports that "African and world leaders have celebrated the democratic election in Senegal this month, and moved to condemn the coup in Mali."

It is hard to believe that these two North-Western African Countries have experienced such different electoral results. One African State celebrates a successful election and democracy. While another African State falls to a coup and becomes isolated from the international community. It is hard to believe because these African States are neighbours.

AfricaFocus goes on to describe the State of Democracy in Africa and tells us that the real concern lies in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

"In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), however, there is hardly any international attention to the post-election crisis following last November's election. This despite the prominent role of the United Nations and "donor" countries in sustaining the government of this strategically located country, the largest by area in sub-Saharan Africa."

"When the DRC does attract international attention, it is more likely for being one of the countries affected by the attacks of the Lord's Resistance Army; for the multifaceted ongoing conflict in the east of the country, with its high frequency of conflict-related rapes, and the related debate over "conflict minerals" exported from that area; for the recent International Criminal Court conviction of Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga; or for the failure of impunity for widespread violations of human rights by both Congolese and foreign combatants in "Africa's World War" over the years from 1993 to 2003."

I thought that this point was particularly relevant as the Kony 2012 campaign has brought so much attention to the issue's facing Uganda and the notorious Lord's Resistance Army. Yet, there hasn't been a Congo 2012 campaign and there has been no international concern over the ongoing crisis in the Congo. The DRC is headed for another war and it is arguable whether or not the last one really ended in 2003. Just listen to how conflicted the current arrangement is for Congolese governance:

"President Joseph Kabila, the disputed incumbent, has not yet appointed a new government, more than three months after the election. And even when he does, as a coalition of Congolese civil society organizations noted in February, the country will still have two heads of government, one legal but illegitimate (the incumbent) and the other legitimate but not legal (the challenger Etienne Tshisekedi)."

On February 9, 2012, A Letter from Congolese Civil Society to the Secretary General of the United Nations addressed several issues regarding the Post-Electoral Crisis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. A summary of the letter appears in Africa: Democracy Still Deferred.

Congolese Civil Society believes that:

The Security Council/General Secretary should:

• Give MONUSCO the mandate for election observation and certification of results;
• Start with the prior established of a new office to give credibility and integrity to the INEC, replacing the current staff and including civil society;
• Apply a comprehensive solution to both the presidential and parliamentary elections without separating them;
• Require disclosure by the INEC of all the minutes as they were displayed on the night of the election;
• Clearly and strongly request the government to guarantee free democratic expression of the Congolese people, including freedom to demonstrate;
• Obtain a mandate for UN election monitoring and certification of results;

Decide between two options:

• recount the votes; or
• organize a second round of voting for presidential and legislative elections, combined with local and provincial. These could take place within 6 months rather than in March 2012 so as not to botch them again;
• Protect key opposition leaders through armed guards selected by mutual agreement with the protected persons. More specifically, the safety of Mr. Etienne Tshisekedi must be ensured by a contingent of the UN; Ensure freedom of movement and expression for all political leaders.

If you are interested in this post and want to learn more I would suggest reading:

Congolese Vote, but Who Decides?
By Georges Nzongola-Ntalaja
Published By: African Futures
Possible Futures: A Project of the Social Science Research Council


Canada ends NATO surveillance drone deal

(L-R) NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Canadian defense minister Peter Gordon MacKay, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Advisor, speak with Afghanistan's Defence Minister, General Abdul Rahim Wardak on the second day of talks on February 3, 2012.

On March 17, 2012 David Pugliese of The Vancouver Sun reported that "Canadian Forces hope to save $90 million a year by pulling out of NATO programs operating unmanned aerial vehicles as well as airborne early warning planes. Defence Minister Peter MacKay said it will free up 142 Canadians assigned to NATO for new jobs."
"The shutdown of Canada’s contribution to NATO’s airborne warning aircraft, known as AWACS, will save about $50 million a year. Another $40 million a year will be saved as a result of Canada’s withdrawal from NATO’s Alliance Ground Surveillance Program. Canada has been involved in NATO’s AWACS program for more than 25 years and the aircraft were seen as key to the alliance’s success during the recent war in Libya."


(Heron 1 UAV, Canada)

"U.S. unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs as they are known in military parlance, were also used to gather intelligence information during the Libyan conflict. NATO wants to ease the strain on the U.S. UAVs by having a pool of Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicles at the alliance’s disposal.
Canada’s pull out from the UAV program will be done by the end of April, the Defence Department confirmed."
I think this is some amazing technology and it's too bad that we are ending our contribution with NATO and the Countries we have previously had partnerships with.


(Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle, U.S.)

Canada Confers Honorary Citizenship On Aung San Suu Kyi

Aung San Suu Kyi is a Burmese opposition politician and the General Secretary of the National League for Democracy. She was under house arrest from July 1989 until her recent release in November of 2010.

She is featured above speaking to a group of Carleton University students about democracy in Burma.
In a CBC article, published March 8, 2012: Baird learns of possible Burma vote rigging; the Canadian government announced that it will be monitoring Burma's elections next month.

Aung San Suu Kyi, democratic icon and Nobel Peace laureate, greeted Minister Baird at her home in Rangoon where she has been under house arrest for the last 23 years for opposing the ruling military junta.
Baird came bearing the gift of honorary Canadian citizenship for Suu Kyi. Suu Kyi used the meeting to express concerns about vote rigging in Burma.

Suu Kyi requested that Canadian monitors pay close attention to the elections to ensure more legitimacy for the electoral process. Baird said that he would be "thrilled to lift the Canadian sanctions against the current government."

Baird said of the Burmese elections that "they won't be perfect elections, but they will be fair, open and transparent ... The whole world will be watching, as will Canada."

"In a way, Baird is making history," reported the CBC's Adrienne Arsenault. "He's the first Canadian foreign affairs minister to ever set foot in Burma. However, in terms of global politicians, he joins a parade of people who have recently come through Burma over the last several months. Many are asking, is this reform for real, or reform for the sake of attracting the attention of international investment?"

Robocalls Scandal

Fraudulent pre-recorded phone calls were made during the May Federal Election in Guelph ridings. The use of voter-suppression campaigns and push-polling are used with more frequency south of the border in the United States. The Conservative Party has been accused by the Opposition of using robocalls that pose as Liberal Party members and misdirect voters to the wrong polling stations.

David Soberman, Canadian National Chair in Strategic marketing at the University of Toronto predicts that changes will occur within the Canadian election process to prevent this occurring again in the future. Soberman said that "if you're Elections Canada, you think, 'What is it that we can do to ensure this doesn't happen again ... considering it's never happened here before."

NDP Opposition MP Pat Martin said the Tories appear to have borrowed their tactics from gangsters and criminals. Martin is pictured above during Question Period February 28, 2012.

An article by Michelle Zilio of the Ottawa Citizen stated that the robocalls are a shock to the system of Canadian democracy. Joseph Cummins, a U.S. author of electoral 'dirty tricks' said that "Misdirecting voters to a different place is a pretty serious dirty trick because you're disenfranchising them and taking away their right to have a voice in their government."

Another Ottawa Citizen article by Jeff Davis stated that Elections Canada was falling down on electoral fraud. The article goes on to describe the Harper Government's reaction to the scandal in the House of Commons during Tuesday's question period. RackNine, a Tory-linked firm has been connected with the scandal. Among the activities flagged by Elections Canada in the 2011 Federal Election are unsolicited telephone calls, automated telephone messages and crank calls.

Former Chief Electoral Officer Jean-Pierre Kingsley said "judges might crack down on any attempts at voter suppression ... We've never seen anything on this scale. Since we're attacking constitutional rights of individual electors, the judge could expand the maximum penalty and impose a jail sentence."

A spokesperson for Elections Canada has publicly stated that "The Commissioner of Elections Canada will not confirm or deny that a complaint has been received or that an investigation is underway"